(image source: conference website)
I presented a paper at the conference Monarchy & Modernity, 1500-1945 held in Cambridge today and yesterday.
Abstract:
The External Monarch: Royal War Powers in the Public Law of Europe
The power to declare war and make peace was one of the
essential competences of old regime sovereigns. For Thomas Paine, continuous old
regime warfare was an easy pretext to sideline national representations, and to
rule without bonds.[1]
The ‘modern’ American (1787) and French (1791) constitutions tied the executive
branch to the legislators’ consent when declaring war.[2]
Yet, the reality was more nuanced, and these
principles did not prevail everywhere. In Britain, cessions of territory were
tied to parliamentary consent.[3] In
Sweden, the Riksdag needed to consent
in monarchical decisions regarding war and peace. By contrast, the “absolute”
courts of Vienna, St Petersburg and Berlin were taken as an example to shield
monarchs as William I of the United Kingdom of the Netherlands from
parliamentary control in foreign affairs.[4]
Treatises on the law of nations provide a synthesis of
the different solutions provided in the “Public Law of Europe”. Moreover, the horizontal
conduct of international relations is affected by internal constitutional
change, through the theory of recognition. [5]
I propose to examine the monarch’s position in the
works of Georg Friedrich von Martens (1756-1821) and Johann Ludwig Klüber
(1762-1837), emblematic figures of the so-called “positivist” school of
international law.[6],
against the backdrop of continuity with 18th century law of nations
theory[7]
and resistance against the later
establishment of the nationality principle.[8]
[1] Thomas Paine, Rights of Man Being an Answer to Mr.
Burke’s Attack on the French Revolution. By Thomas Paine (printed for J S
Jordan, 1791) 159–160.
[2] Marc Belissa, fraternité universelle et intérêt national
(1713-1795) : Les cosmopolitiques du droit des dens (Kimé 1998); Willem
Theo Oosterveld, The Law of Nations in Early American Foreign Policy. Theory
and Practice from the Revolution to the Monroe Doctrine (Brill/Nijhoff
2016).
[3] David Armitage, ‘Parliament and International Law in
the Eighteenth Century’ in Julian Hoppit (ed), Parliaments, nations and
identities in Britain and Ireland, 1660-1850 (Manchester University Press
2003).
[4] Frederik Dhondt, ‘Inaugurating a Dutch Napoleon?
Conservative Criticism of the 1815 Constitution of the United Kingdom of the
Netherlands’ in Ulrike Müssig (ed), Reconsidering Constitutional Formation
II: Decisive Constitutional Normativity. From Old Liberties to New Precedence,
vol 12 (Springer 2018).
[5] Martin Clark, ‘A Conceptual History of Recognition in
British International Legal Thought’ British Yearbook of International Law
(published online at https://doi.org/10.1093/bybil/bry003).
[6] Martti Koskenniemi, ‘Into Positivism: Georg Friedrich
Martens (1756-1821) and Modern International Law’ (2008) 15 Constellations 189;
Georg Friedrich von Martens, Précis du droit des gens moderne de l’Europe fondé
sur les traités et l’usage. Pour servir d’introduction à un politique et diplomatique
(3rd edn, Dieterich 1821); Johann Ludwig Klüber, Droit des gens moderne de
l’Europe (J G Cotta 1819).
[7] Emer de Vattel, Le droit des gens, ou principes de la loi
naturelle, appliqués à la conduite & aux affaires des Nations & des
Souverains (s.n 1758); Emmanuelle Jouannet, Emer de Vattel et
l’émergence doctrinale du droit international classique (Pédone 1998);
Gaspard Réal de Curban, La Science du Gouvernement, t. 5: contenant le droit
des gens, qui traite les Ambassades; de la Guerre; des Traités; des Titres; des
Prérogatives; des Prétentions, & des droits respectifs des souverains
(Les libraires associés 1764); David Armitage, Foundations of Modern
International Thought (Cambridge UP 2012).
[8] Terenzio Mamiani della Rovere, Rights of Nations,
or, the New Law of European States Applied to the Affairs of Italy (Roger
Acton tr, Jeffs 1860); Werner Daum and others (eds), Handbuch der
europäischen Verfassungsgeschichte im 19. Jahrhundert: Institutionen und Rechtspraxis im
gesellschaftlichen Wandel. Bd. 2: 1815-1847, vol 2 (Dietz ; 2012).
More information on the conference website.
